im want to know if there is a special technique to weld moly?im in school to learn how to weld,my instructors did not know if there was a special way.i would like to know for the reason the reason im going to school is to build race cars.thanks
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
chromemoly welding
Collapse
X
-
lots of people will agree that the way to weld chromoly is to TIG weld it, but mild steel filler. the reason being: chromoly is a hard material. when you weld it, it has a tendency to destroy these properties and cause weak points. if you MIG it, you will most likely overheat the material (further away from the weld too). by TIGing it, you can control the heat better and direct it exactly where you want.
the reason for using mild steel filler is that because chromoly is so hard, the weakest part will be the material near the weld (not at it). if the filler is just as hard as the rest of the material and doesn't allow the piece to give at all. the piece will likely tear at the weak point. by using mild steel, there is less rigidity at the joint which allows everything else to be rigid and still allow enough give in the piece (less stress on the other material). the mild steel filler will be plenty strong to hold up.-SPiNNeR-
Hobart 135
Oxy-Acet w/ Victor torch
Dynasty 200 DX
-
-
Originally posted by TheRealSpinner View Postlots of people will agree that the way to weld chromoly is to TIG weld it, but mild steel filler. the reason being: chromoly is a hard material.
Originally posted by TheRealSpinner View Postif you MIG it, you will most likely overheat the material (further away from the weld too).
Originally posted by TheRealSpinner View Postif the filler is just as hard as the rest of the material and doesn't allow the piece to give at all.
Originally posted by TheRealSpinner View Postthe piece will likely tear at the weak point. by using mild steel, there is less rigidity at the joint which allows everything else to be rigid and still allow enough give in the piece (less stress on the other material). the mild steel filler will be plenty strong to hold up.
Use the search button and 4130 and/or my name and you will find all you ever want to read.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Billet Benny View PostI disagree..
100% wrong....
wrong. no matter what filler you use there is no difference in rigidity of the joint... ...with matching filler your weld itself becomes very impact and crack sensitive and is normally your abnormally weak point.
You say he's wrong about chromoly being hard, then acknowledge that it's harder than mild steel. You say he's wrong in suggesting a chromoly joint welded with matching filler is "hard" or more "rigid", yet you go on to say that such a joint is "very impact and crack sensitive and is normally your abnormally weak point".
Spinner, I think you provided good info in the context of the question.
Dirt Monster, the search button is your friend. You can read more than you ever wanted to know about chromoly welding, and Benny can review and correct all questionable terminology.
JD
Comment
-
-
I will try to stay clear of any conflicts in this post.
Primarily race car frames are welded with GTAW, most for cosmetics, racers like pretty welds. Cr-Mo Tube (typically 4130) can be welded with GMAW or GTAW processes and be equally strong. There was a nice article in the PowerClick for GMAW of 4130. However when welding 4130 and similar alloys you should weld with 80S-D2 filler to more closely match the alloy properties. If you are welding higher carbon content alloy 4140 and such a little preheat would be recommended.
I have both 80S-D2 in cut lengths for GTAW and 0.035" for GMAW.
With any steel alloy, the higher the carbon the higher the preheat.Ron
ShopFloorTalk
Millermatic 350P, Roughneck 4012 and Ironmate guns
Dynasty 300DX, Coolmate 3, Crafter CS-310 Torch
Trailblazer 302, 12RC, WC-24
30A spoolgun
Spectrum 2050
Thermal Arc Plasma Welder PS-3000/WC-100B
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by JD in Socal View PostAll right, Mr. Smarty-pants. I thought Spinner made good points and got the idea across. This isn't welding college here, and the general concepts are what is important, which he addressed pretty well.
Originally posted by JD in Socal View PostYou say he's wrong about chromoly being hard, then acknowledge that it's harder than mild steel.
Originally posted by JD in Socal View PostYou say he's wrong in suggesting a chromoly joint welded with matching filler is "hard" or more "rigid", yet you go on to say that such a joint is "very impact and crack sensitive and is normally your abnormally weak point".
Using lower carbon steel fillers works as welded because it gets away from the problems of having a weld bead with high hardenability that cools fast. It now won't crack upon cooling and will show ductility upon impact and stress. You could end up with a weld that with stands all this with a matching filler, but it'd be a crap shoot and not repeatable. The weakened zone will be at the edge of the haz and normally a fully welded joint with mild steel filler is going to be stronger than that anyways yet offers a lot more forgiveness in the welding process.. I hope that clears it up a little.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by Billet Benny View PostI hope that clears it up a little.
I'm not sure it significantly changes the message that Dirt monster got from the Spinner (feel free to disagree), but it is definitely more technically accurate. Thanks for clarifying your points.
Oh, and I was just kidding about the smarty-pants thing.
JD
Comment
-
-
I appreciate the knowledge and knowhow that members like Benny have, but personally, I like answers like the one I gave; pretty concise, without a lot of technicality. In the end, I believe that both the answers (mine and Benny's) were very similar.
I would like to say that I did attacked by the WAY that Benny corrected my answer, but I am glad that there are people on this forum with knowledge to do so.-SPiNNeR-
Hobart 135
Oxy-Acet w/ Victor torch
Dynasty 200 DX
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by TheRealSpinner View PostI appreciate the knowledge and knowhow that members like Benny have, but personally, I like answers like the one I gave; pretty concise, without a lot of technicality. In the end, I believe that both the answers (mine and Benny's) were very similar.
I would like to say that I did attacked by the WAY that Benny corrected my answer, but I am glad that there are people on this forum with knowledge to do so.
What I thought you were getting at was that matching filler is a bad idea because the welded joint becomes rigid and won't give therefore causing the surrounding tube to fail. That is not correct information and that's what I was trying to refute. If that's not what you meant, then I just understood it wrong. That's where I thought our two explanations differ. Using a mild steel filler does NOT give the joint more "give" thus creating less stress on the surrounding tube. That's not how it works. That's the point I was attempting to make.
Also on the mig welding part. To be quick with it. Mig inherently has the smallest haz of the common arc welding processes which makes it touchy for 4130 because it allows the deposited weld and haz to cool quickly which we know is a bad bad thing. This is simply fixed with some proper preheating to slow the cooling rate to more mimic that of the tig process.
Think about it this way. We know oxy-fuel is a very accepted and sound process for 4130. We also know it is a very high heat input welding process. As a by product of this the welds deposited via oxy-fuel cool slowly (relatively speaking).
We also know mig, tig, and oxy are similar in that they create a weld by melting base metal and adding filler.
Now IF haz sizes in order from smallest to largest went like this (which they don't): tig - mig - oxy.. why would it make sense that oxy fuel is so good and mig is not, when we know tig is well accepted and used?
The actual haz sizes for the processes from smallest to largest go like this: mig - tig - oxy.. This is really why oxy and tig are such good processes for 4130. Because both tig and oxy have enough heat input per adequate weld size to slow cooling down enough to not form an overly quenched weld.
This is probably the most important part of welding 4130, not cooling the weld overly fast. Tig and oxy are processes that just lend themselves to this without any conscious effort so they fit the bill well.
4130 is not magic, just different and a bit tempermental.
Just wanted to touch on that.
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by shadetreewelder View PostPrimarily race car frames are welded with GTAW, most for cosmetics, racers like pretty welds. Cr-Mo Tube (typically 4130) can be welded with GMAW or GTAW processes and be equally strong. There was a nice article in the PowerClick for GMAW of 4130. However when welding 4130 and similar alloys you should weld with 80S-D2 filler to more closely match the alloy properties. If you are welding higher carbon content alloy 4140 and such a little preheat would be recommended.
I have both 80S-D2 in cut lengths for GTAW and 0.035" for GMAW.
Originally posted by Billet Benny View PostWhat I thought you were getting at was that matching filler is a bad idea because the welded joint becomes rigid and won't give therefore causing the surrounding tube to fail. That is not correct information and that's what I was trying to refute.
Getting back to welding it… I’m not sure if ER80S-… filler is really that big a deal anyway, since yes, it is closer in strength to the 4130 (and to 1020, and especially 1026 which is designed for tubular structures), but the fillet/thicker section of the actual weld makes the minor difference in yield strength irrelevant, since the welded area if done correctly will be larger and stronger anyway.
Also on the mig welding part. To be quick with it. Mig inherently has the smallest haz of the common arc welding processes which makes it touchy for 4130 because it allows the deposited weld and haz to cool quickly which we know is a bad bad thing. This is simply fixed with some proper preheating to slow the cooling rate to more mimic that of the tig process.
I do love how most people want to convince you that you can create a smaller HAZ with TIG… not at all unless you don’t get the same penetration as with the MIG…Mark
(aka: Silverback, WS6 TA, JYDog, 83 Crossfire TA, mpikas, mmp...)
Synchrowave 180 SD | MillerMatic 211MVP + Spoolmate | Hobart Handler 135 | Everlast Power Plasma 50
1960 Bridgeport J-head | Grizzly 10x22 | HF bandsaw | Rigid 4.5” angle grinder (+2 cheapie HF ones)
BFH
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by dirtmonster17 View Postim want to know if there is a special technique to weld moly?im in school to learn how to weld,my instructors did not know if there was a special way.i would like to know for the reason the reason im going to school is to build race cars.thanks
A properly notched tube is a start to a good weld. And then try to weld the notched tubes. A simple tee will get you started. Keep adding tubes to your existing tee. And if you got what it takes work it from there.
Cromoly welds like mild steel but it has the potential to get harder and that presents other problems that you can learn a bought once you get the basic fitting and welding
That is a subject your teacher should be able to address?
.
By far the best way to weld tight tube structures where constant repositioning and lots of small weld segments are common is TIG.
Mig is acceptable on larger open areas with long weld segments.
Making structures with steel take a lot more than just knowing how to weld, the hardest part for me is getting it all to fit together with a great fit. That will assure a once it gets welded together it ends up with little distortion and strong.
Good luck with building race cars you can do it.Pliers
Screwdriver
Hammer
Comment
-
Comment