aphexafx,
Miller is listening. It is probably not going to happen. The extra 60bk per file would really add up over a time period considering the number of attachments posted. Therefore, space being a consideration, a couple of options would come to light: Increase the amount of drive space for the site-probably not an option due to financial constraints. See older posts deleted to free up drive space-not a good option for those browsing or using the search feature.
Maybe we will come up with a better idea to dump the 1024x768 files into a highly legible package in a100kb file. I like could set up a new server to host members attachments, but that is not really a solution. We need to figure it out on this site.
Miller is listening. It is probably not going to happen. The extra 60bk per file would really add up over a time period considering the number of attachments posted. Therefore, space being a consideration, a couple of options would come to light: Increase the amount of drive space for the site-probably not an option due to financial constraints. See older posts deleted to free up drive space-not a good option for those browsing or using the search feature.
Maybe we will come up with a better idea to dump the 1024x768 files into a highly legible package in a100kb file. I like could set up a new server to host members attachments, but that is not really a solution. We need to figure it out on this site.
Comment