Pulser for the 180SD

[HAWK]

Worthwhile Yes Practical No

TMT,

THE PC 300 IS A NICE PULSER, BUT FALLS WELL SHORT OF THE BUILT IN PULSER OF THE D200DX. THE DYNASTY HAS A RANGE OF 0-500 PPS WITH TOTALLY ADJUSTABLE PEAK / BACKGOUND AMPERAGE PARAMETERS. IT ALSO HAS COMPLETE SEQUENCING FUNCTIONS. IN ADDITION THERE ARE CABLES HANGING AROUND WHEN YOU ADD EXTERNAL PENDANTS SUCH AS THE PC 300 WHERE THE D200DX IS COMPLETELY SELF CONTAINED.

CHECK OUT AND COMPARE THIS TO THE PC300 CHECK THE 3RD ITEM ON THIS LINK

BY THE WAY THE COST OF THE SYNCRO 180 AND THE PC 300 IS FAST APPROACHING THE D200DX.

HOPE THIS HELPS.

[Too_Many_Tools]

Is the pulser option for the 180SD a worthwhile addition?

I note that a number of people have commented favorly on the pulser capability of the 200DX.

Has anyone built a homemade equivalent of the pulser addition for the Syncowave welders? If so, would you mind discussing it?

Thanks

TMT