Oh no! What's wrong with the multimatic 200? I kind of like that machine. Had it on my want list.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Diversion 180 - IGBT catastrophic failure
Collapse
X
-
That's one reason the Dynasty 210 looks so promising. Much higher duty cycle, even when rated as Miller does.
www.facebook.com/outbackaluminumwelding
Miller Dynasty 700...OH YEA BABY!!
MM 350P...PULSE SPRAYIN' MONSTER
Miller Dynasty 280 with AC independent expansion card
Miller Dynasty 200 DX "Blue Lightning"
Miller Bobcat 225 NT (what I began my present Biz with!)
Miller 30-A Spoolgun
Miller WC-115-A
Miller Spectrum 300
Miller 225 Thunderbolt (my first machine bought new 1980)
Miller Digital Elite Titanium 9400
Comment
-
-
Originally posted by chuckies76ta View PostIf any of you have a PC-1 board that has failed, can you private message me. Thank you
www.facebook.com/outbackaluminumwelding
Miller Dynasty 700...OH YEA BABY!!
MM 350P...PULSE SPRAYIN' MONSTER
Miller Dynasty 280 with AC independent expansion card
Miller Dynasty 200 DX "Blue Lightning"
Miller Bobcat 225 NT (what I began my present Biz with!)
Miller 30-A Spoolgun
Miller WC-115-A
Miller Spectrum 300
Miller 225 Thunderbolt (my first machine bought new 1980)
Miller Digital Elite Titanium 9400
Comment
-
-
Machines of this class all deliver right around the same duty cycle performance --- here's the Lincoln SW 200 TIG data. I use my 180 "light" (don't have a water cooler hooked up to push duty cycles) and the thing just works, pretty much does all the "light" work I ask of it --- outstanding welder in its price range.INPUT POWER - 120/230/1/50/60
RATED OUTPUT - 120V:
- TIG: 125A/25% (AC TIG 110A/25%)
- TIG: 100A/40%
- TIG: 85A/60%
- Stick: 75A/20%
- Stick: 65A/60%
- 230V:
- TIG: 200A/25%
- TIG: 160A/40%
- TIG: 130A/60%
- Stick: 170A/20%
- Stick: 100A/60%
INPUT CURRENT - 120V:
- TIG: 25% Duty Cycle 21A
- TIG: 40% Duty Cycle 17A
- TIG: 60% Duty Cycle 14A
- Stick: 20% Duty Cycle 19A
- Stick: 60% Duty Cycle 16A
- 230V:
- TIG: 25% Duty Cycle 22A
- TIG: 40% Duty Cycle 17A
- TIG: 60% Duty Cycle 13A
OUTPUT RANGE - 120V:
- TIG: 10-125A
- Stick: 10-90A
- 230V:
- TIG: 10-200A
- Stick: 10-170A
ESAB TIG 252 with Miller CoolMate
Spectrum 875
Diversion 180
Oxy-A (Harris, ESAB, Ox Weld)
Miller 252
MM 211
CST 280
Trailblazer - Kubota
http://www.blackdiamondblooms.com/
Comment
-
Comment
-
-
Here's the best quote I could find that tells you why these materials are important:
"There are multiple reasons for the rising popularity of SiC and GaN: They operate at higher voltages and temperatures, are more rugged, have longer lifetimes, and switch much faster than conventional semiconductor devices."
This stuff is all here now, but isn't in current products. In fact, some of it is barely out of the laboratory. Manufacturing these materials into transistors cost-effectively seems to be moving along slowly. Until then they will be pricey.
Comment
-
-
Yes, without the presenter's narrative for the slide show, that is pretty much a generic reliability presentation outline. Not much to see there. IGBT technology has come a long way, but they are still high impedance devices with sensitivity to static discharge and cosmic rays. I would love to see data on IGBT failures related to the 11-year sunspot cycle; lots of cosmic rays at the peak, and I suspect a lot of failed IGBTs. Not the serious problem it was originally, but I suspect it is still an issue. I wonder what the words were that went with the "<1 FIT" line. FIT is reliability engineer talk for Failures In Time. 1 FIT = one failure in a billion hours of operation. That's something like 114,000 years. Really? They're saying these devices are virtually "failproof"? I can't imagine they were saying that, and if they were, I'm not believing it.
The silicon carbide FET (field-effect transistor) drop-in replacement for IGBTs is interesting--anxious to see if welders evolve from IGBT to the SiC technology as it matures in the high voltage/high current realm. FETs used to be kind of failure prone, as IGBTs are somewhat today. However, FETs have come a long way, and IGBTs may do the same.They are certainly far better than when they first came out.. Or, they may be eclipsed by new FETs.Last edited by Aeronca41; 07-26-2019, 04:08 PM.
Comment
-
Comment