I've always heard stray arc strikes cause stress points and are viewed as defects. So, why are temporary fitments allowed? Wouldn't those also induce stress points? By temp fitments I'm thinking of pad eyes, aliment jigs etc. Is there some procedure to follow when removing them to relieve stresses or is it completely a non-issue? If the later why?
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
stray arc strikes, temp fitments & stress pts
Collapse
X
-
Here are some pictures of an arc strike. Down in the strike crater you can see the "nugget" or melted metal. Inside of the nugget there are more than a dozen solidification cracks. Also on the outside of the nugget you can see that there is extreme overlap which will reduce the included angle at the toe to zero. The crater also has a reduced section now without any transitional surfaces to allow the tension on the material surface (where most of it transfers) to flow freely. Instead it is producing all of these risers in a very small location. since we know location is everythingyou can show a model where they are all combined and have a much larger effect as a single indication compared to just adding up this one and that one.
We also need to consider the effect of such a rapid heating and cooling cycle. The material depending on its type may produce and likely will extremely hard areas in the weld metal and in the HAZ.
Temporary weld on attachments on the other hand will most of the time be accompanied by some grinding, longer heat cycles, some type of finishing and altogether just better care than an arc strike.
Hope this helps
-
That was very interesting! I learned a bunch.
I can understand why stray strikes are bad but still don't quite understand why application/removal of temporary fitments aren't. In the later case the homogenous base metal is being melted and combined w/ another metal. In that regard doesn't the weld and subsequent removal process form some sort of discontinuity(ies)? This is done all the time so it must be 'safe'. However, it seems as though some method or procedure must be followed to make sure the out come is good.
Comment
-
This is kind of an apples and oranges discussion. As Diamonback said, arc strikes leave a point with many stress risers for cracks to start. After removing a temporary fitting, the area is usually ground down removing those potential stress risers. After removing a temporary fitting the HAZ is still there, but has nothing to do with the stress risers of an arc strike. If the HAZ is a potential failure point on critical projects, whether from a temp. fitting or at the final welds, the whole piece is usually annealed and heat treated.Sometimes there's no second chances.
Comment
-
Originally posted by HayFarmer View PostThat was very interesting! I learned a bunch.
I can understand why stray strikes are bad but still don't quite understand why application/removal of temporary fitments aren't. In the later case the homogenous base metal is being melted and combined w/ another metal. In that regard doesn't the weld and subsequent removal process form some sort of discontinuity(ies)? This is done all the time so it must be 'safe'. However, it seems as though some method or procedure must be followed to make sure the out come is good.
Comment
-
arc strikes
a arc strike happens in a split second, there is no real heat soak taking place.its a quick heat cycle causing martensite ( very hard structure ) this is why it is extremely difficult to file out, the file just glides over the top.
As for small tack welds the idea is to make them about 1/2-1" long depending on the material thickness. this is long enough to get a good heat soak into the parent material and a longer cool down, eliminating a martensite structure. a weld procedure should be followed for code work, even for tacking and a high enough pre-heat temp should be used to avoid quenching.
this is in laymens terms,there is a bit more to it than that.
hope this helps.PS martinsite leads to cracks in a stressed weldment!Last edited by maharg; 06-09-2010, 07:32 PM.
Comment
-
Arc strikes, fast and sudden, shouldn't be there, but do happen. Am presently on a nickel project on which 2 men work steady doing pickups on removed temporary attachments and unfortunate arc strikes. Procedure is to grind flush and excavate any sign of inclusion in base metal. Often an arc strike will produce a single pore or porosity. If weld is needed, area is preheated to 125 F. Final blending must produce virtually no depth in base metal. Area is then dye pentetrant tested. On the completed project, there will be a few thousand of these.
Comment
-
Originally posted by OldSparks View PostArc strikes, fast and sudden, shouldn't be there, but do happen. Am presently on a nickel project on which 2 men work steady doing pickups on removed temporary attachments and unfortunate arc strikes. Procedure is to grind flush and excavate any sign of inclusion in base metal. Often an arc strike will produce a single pore or porosity. If weld is needed, area is preheated to 125 F. Final blending must produce virtually no depth in base metal. Area is then dye pentetrant tested. On the completed project, there will be a few thousand of these.Millermatic350P/Python, MillermaticReach/Q300
Millermatic175
MillermaticPassport/Q300
HTP MIG200
PowCon 300SM, MK Cobramatic
ThermalArc 185ACDC, Dynaflux Tig'r, CK-20
DialarcHF, Radiator-1
Hypertherm PowerMax 380
Purox oxy/ace
Jackson EQC
-F350 CrewCab 4x4
-LoadNGo utility bed
-Bobcat 250NT
-PassportPlus/Q300
-XMT304/Optima/Spoolmatic15A
-Suitcase8RC/Q400
-Suitcase12RC/Q300
-Smith oxy/propane
-Jackson EQC
Comment
-
Originally posted by OldSparks View PostAm presently on a nickel project on which 2 men work steady doing pickups on removed temporary attachments and unfortunate arc strikes.Originally posted by Desertrider33 View PostWow, that's alot of stinger handling mistakes!at home:
2012 325 Trailblazer EFI with Excel power
2007 302 Trailblazer with the Robin SOLD
2008 Suitcase 12RC
Spoolmatic 30A
WC-24
2009 Dynasty 200DX
2000 XMT 304
2008 Thermal Dynamics Cutmaster 52
Sold:MM130XP
Sold:MM 251
Sold:CST 280
at work:
Invision 350MP
Dynasty 350
Millermatic 350P
Retired:Shopmaster 300 with a HF-251
Comment
-
c wagner.....thanks for clarifying that. Pick-up repairs are done the same whether they are marks left by arc, hammer, grinder, clamps or anything else that appears to be deeper then the primer paint. Biggest cause of arc marks would be trying to get full use out of each rod. The inconel rod we're using can get be pretty fussy about relighting when you're just tacking. At four times the cost of stainless you don't like thowing out any long stubs. It's possible to go for days with nice clean restarts but not forever.
Comment
-
Originally posted by OldSparks View PostBiggest cause of arc marks would be trying to get full use out of each rod. The inconel rod we're using can get be pretty fussy about relighting when you're just tacking. At four times the cost of stainless you don't like thowing out any long stubs. It's possible to go for days with nice clean restarts but not forever.
Thanks.at home:
2012 325 Trailblazer EFI with Excel power
2007 302 Trailblazer with the Robin SOLD
2008 Suitcase 12RC
Spoolmatic 30A
WC-24
2009 Dynasty 200DX
2000 XMT 304
2008 Thermal Dynamics Cutmaster 52
Sold:MM130XP
Sold:MM 251
Sold:CST 280
at work:
Invision 350MP
Dynasty 350
Millermatic 350P
Retired:Shopmaster 300 with a HF-251
Comment
-
Arc Strike/ Arc Damage
Hello!!, it is the first time that I consult to a forum like this. I'd like to ask if there is a specific way to rework or remove the arc strikes when these seem to be superficial? and also I'd like to know...what is the probability of a failiure on the reworked area?
Thanks.
Comment
Comment