Thanks Joe,
I understand the procedure, and your post is helpful. I am concerned with what the benefits are etc. I guess the best way to find out is to experiment and see what happens, I am using 500 cycles and 50 percent peak and 20 percent background. It does make the tungsten point last longer as the low current (14amps) would be better suited to the .020 tungsten but that is so fragile I really dont like using it.
I am going to experiment with a much higher current and less percentage on the peak and maintain the same average and see what it looks like. penetration isnt critical on this particular weld but it does need to look nice.
I am thinking that my main problems are eyesight and hand control, both of which could be cured by shaving 40 years off my age ha!!
It is a nice machine though, I tried stick the other day and it worked fine too.
I understand the procedure, and your post is helpful. I am concerned with what the benefits are etc. I guess the best way to find out is to experiment and see what happens, I am using 500 cycles and 50 percent peak and 20 percent background. It does make the tungsten point last longer as the low current (14amps) would be better suited to the .020 tungsten but that is so fragile I really dont like using it.
I am going to experiment with a much higher current and less percentage on the peak and maintain the same average and see what it looks like. penetration isnt critical on this particular weld but it does need to look nice.
I am thinking that my main problems are eyesight and hand control, both of which could be cured by shaving 40 years off my age ha!!
It is a nice machine though, I tried stick the other day and it worked fine too.
Comment